|
|
Post by Rhyman on Jul 13, 2012 11:51:06 GMT
In some battles cases the Death ICBM because it costs 400 i think i havent played on it in a while but for 1 blast seems a bit over priced
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 13, 2012 12:52:05 GMT
In some battles cases the Death ICBM because it costs 400 i think i havent played on it in a while but for 1 blast seems a bit over priced not really it makes short work of the heros. but then again 400 dose seam slightly high when a walking bomb will do the same but for less hp. |
|
|
|
Post by Jay24092 on Jul 13, 2012 12:54:18 GMT
Yes but on longer battles it's a waste
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 13, 2012 13:00:24 GMT
i have not noticed that because iv never used it on big fights.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rhyman on Jul 13, 2012 13:02:38 GMT
I think protomars is over price or i am biast
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 13, 2012 13:06:47 GMT
I think protomars is over price or i am biast cyber mars is better than proto mars. but then again cyber mars is the same as machine red (it might be to do with me not noticing any differences) only difference is the price. for Proto mars you get high HP Good damage and for 900 cost. yeah your right |
|
njayhuang
Staff Member 
Cyber Ninja
Without Asuka from Germany, everybody would be lost
Posts: 3,472
|
Post by njayhuang on Jul 13, 2012 15:44:50 GMT
Mars has double shots; Red has single shots. The only difference between the Cybers and the Protos is that Cybers can combine and they level up twice as fast as Protos.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jay24092 on Jul 16, 2012 18:51:46 GMT
Beam gunner
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 16, 2012 19:52:04 GMT
no. he is the the right price. you get 300HP and a shot that can kill level 1 Normal Ninjas. he is also quick on the ground but not faster than accelerated ninja (think i got the name wrong). the charge attack was a mistake because who would hold B just to fire 2 shoulder beams it should have bean the big cannon. |
|
|
|
Post by Jay24092 on Jul 16, 2012 20:23:00 GMT
Yes but still a bit pricey in my eyes but Antares is expensive
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 16, 2012 20:28:08 GMT
Yes but still a bit pricey in my eyes but Antares is expensive not really if you dont compere death saucer, death ark and sirius. it has 2000HP 10 alpha wings and 20 shots but compered to death saucer, death ark and sirius it is a rip off. |
|
|
|
Post by Jay24092 on Jul 16, 2012 20:35:38 GMT
Well it's a fortress that don't move so you have to compear it to sirus and sirus is cheaper and got better moves
|
|
|
|
Post by Carigun on Jul 16, 2012 20:41:41 GMT
Well it's a fortress that don't move so you have to compear it to sirus and sirus is cheaper and got better moves true but i would not use anteries or sirius to go up agenst CDD i wouldent even use death saucer. i would use gaterlin gunner. |
|
|
|
Post by Stove on Jul 16, 2012 20:56:15 GMT
Beam gunner can take on armies alone.  Antares > Sirius because Sirius's B beam is useless and the alpha wings chip away enemy hp while you use the beams. |
|
|
|
Post by Death Eye on Jul 17, 2012 6:50:40 GMT
the charge attack was a mistake because who would hold B just to fire 2 shoulder beams it should have bean the big cannon. The charge shot is basically the same as the normal shot, only it does double damage since you'll pretty much always hit with both shots. It also works better than the normal shot if you try doing it after the first hit of a melee combo... since the normal shot's not available in that situation. It has its uses, basically, is what I'm getting at. Beam gunner can take on armies alone. Antares > Sirius because Sirius's B beam is useless and the alpha wings chip away enemy hp while you use the beams. The downside is that Antares only gets a maximum of 5 beams while Sirius gets 20, meaning you can't do nearly as much shooting with Antares as you can with Sirius. You essentially have to depend on the consistent but slow damaging power of the Alpha Wings, which isn't nearly as effective as just beaming everything as quickly as possible. Also, Sirius' B shot is good for getting rid of annoyances that you can't reach with the X shot. I would say they don't call it the Anti-Aircraft Gun for nothing, but from what I remember most aircraft can be taken down with the X shot, so that's not really relevant. |
|
|
|
Post by Jay24092 on Jul 17, 2012 8:24:46 GMT
I just think that Antares should have had about 3000hp because it is a carrier
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2012 10:54:43 GMT
Beam Tank
|
|
|
|
Post by Stove on Jul 23, 2012 17:45:16 GMT
the charge attack was a mistake because who would hold B just to fire 2 shoulder beams it should have bean the big cannon. The charge shot is basically the same as the normal shot, only it does double damage since you'll pretty much always hit with both shots. It also works better than the normal shot if you try doing it after the first hit of a melee combo... since the normal shot's not available in that situation. It has its uses, basically, is what I'm getting at. Beam gunner can take on armies alone. Antares > Sirius because Sirius's B beam is useless and the alpha wings chip away enemy hp while you use the beams. The downside is that Antares only gets a maximum of 5 beams while Sirius gets 20, meaning you can't do nearly as much shooting with Antares as you can with Sirius. You essentially have to depend on the consistent but slow damaging power of the Alpha Wings, which isn't nearly as effective as just beaming everything as quickly as possible. Also, Sirius' B shot is good for getting rid of annoyances that you can't reach with the X shot. I would say they don't call it the Anti-Aircraft Gun for nothing, but from what I remember most aircraft can be taken down with the X shot, so that's not really relevant. Its 8 iirc, and youll be spamming the alpha wings so much you wont even notice. "Beam Tank" no. 1. Best lasers ever. 2. Have you SEEN its melee? Most tanks batter you from long range and suck at close, but Beam Tank does both. You can maul someone with Beam tank's drill as fast as you can with a chainsaw knight...and it has superb range, and good HP! The only thing it lacks is speed. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2012 19:10:37 GMT
yeah ok it just annoys me everytime i fight one it kills half of my team but what about meachine head
|
|
|
|
Post by Stove on Jul 23, 2012 19:15:59 GMT
yeah ok it just annoys me everytime i fight one it kills half of my team but what about meachine head I agree, Death/Machine Head are overpriced. |
|
[/url]
